<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Walker House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com</link>
	<description>a catalog of style &#38; inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Royal Watch: Olympic Edition</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3568</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3568#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London 2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, here it is&#8230;the final installment of the Royal Olympic Watch (aka pictures of Duchess Kate). Here she is with David Cameron and Prince Harry (among others) at last night&#8217;s Closing Ceremony. Chic to the very last.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So, here it is&#8230;the final installment of the Royal Olympic Watch (aka pictures of Duchess Kate).</p>
<p>Here she is with David Cameron and Prince Harry (among others) at last night&#8217;s Closing Ceremony. Chic to the very last.</p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371284_free.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3570" title="slide_244460_1371284_free" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371284_free-1024x744.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="744" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371293_free.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3571" title="slide_244460_1371293_free" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371293_free-1024x687.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="687" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371279_free.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3572" title="slide_244460_1371279_free" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/slide_244460_1371279_free-1024x705.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="705" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3568</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Um, that was fast.</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3562</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3562#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, People is reporting that Taylor Swift has bought a house ACROSS THE STREET from the Kennedys in Hyannis Port, Mass. She&#8217;s 22. Conor Kennedy, whom she&#8217;s been dating for a few months at the most, is 18. He just endured a major trauma with the suicide of his mother. Does any of this sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So, People is reporting that Taylor Swift has bought a house ACROSS THE STREET from the Kennedys in Hyannis Port, Mass.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s 22. Conor Kennedy, whom she&#8217;s been dating for a few months at the most, is <strong>18</strong>. He just endured a major trauma with the suicide of his mother. Does any of this sound like the makings of a long term, stable relationship?</p>
<p>Apparently, she loves the area after spending time there with Conor. Ok. But, the house could have been in a nearby town, even a couple of miles away would have been better than this, &#8220;<a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20620562,00.html" target="_blank">It&#8217;s in a beautiful location and <em>right across the street</em> from Conor and the Kennedys</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Oh, Taylor&#8230;you&#8217;re young, but not young enough to be this naive. Come ON now.</p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/taylor-swift-0-300.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3565" title="taylor-swift-0-300" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/taylor-swift-0-300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3562</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sad Jen is engaged&#8230;will the narrative finally change?</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3551</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Theroux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston is engaged to Justin Theroux. Happy news for all involved. Except the tabloids, that is. Can they sell magazines with a happy Jen? Or, is the long running narrative of her being the wronged woman in the Brad-Jen-Angie triangle just too compelling (and profitable) to resist continuing? After all, since 2005&#8211;when Brad and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/jennifer-aniston-440.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3554" title="jennifer-aniston-440" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/jennifer-aniston-440.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="330" /></a></p>
<p>Jennifer Aniston is engaged to Justin Theroux. Happy news for all involved. <em>Except</em> the tabloids, that is. Can they sell magazines with a happy Jen? Or, is the long running narrative of her being the wronged woman in the Brad-Jen-Angie triangle just too compelling (and profitable) to resist continuing?</p>
<p>After all, since 2005&#8211;when Brad and Jen first separated&#8211;millions of magazines have been sold telling the story of &#8220;sad Jen&#8221; left all alone with no one but her dogs and Courtney Cox to comfort her, while evil, selfish, possibly adulterous Brad went off and cold-heartedly frolicked and played happy families with Angelina in the pages of <em>W.</em></p>
<p>Of course, Brad then had the nerve to <em>actually</em> go and create a seemingly happy family life with Angelina<em>, </em>which <em>obviously </em>devasted a helpless, pathetic Jen who was apparently further wronged with the addition of every new child to their (enormous) brood, every house purchased, every almost-wedding that Brad and Angie had<em>. </em>Jen couldn&#8217;t win. And they liked it that way.</p>
<p>Now, with an official announcement of an engagement to<em> People</em>, she seems to be winning again, or at the very least not constantly losing to Brad. Will she be allowed to live out this story? Or, will a new narrative be invented&#8211;one where Jen is only marrying Justin because she couldn&#8217;t find anyone better/is desperate for a family/is threatened by Brad and Angelina&#8217;s engagement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3551</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter vs. NBC</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3544</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3544#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[London 2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the Olympics the twitterverse was consistently on fire with posts bearing the hashtag &#8220;NBCFail&#8221;. Whether it was complaints about Matt Lauer and Meredith Viera&#8217;s commentary during the Opening Ceremony or the network&#8217;s failure to show something deemed critical in their primetime coverage, very little escaped notice or commentary. But, despite the voices crying out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Throughout the Olympics the twitterverse was consistently on fire with posts bearing the hashtag &#8220;NBCFail&#8221;. Whether it was complaints about Matt Lauer and Meredith Viera&#8217;s commentary during the Opening Ceremony or the network&#8217;s failure to show something deemed critical in their primetime coverage, very little escaped notice or commentary.</p>
<p>But, despite the voices crying out from twitter&#8211;no matter how loudly&#8211;NOTHING changed. We hear about the power of social media to effect change on a daily basis but against NBC it seemed almost powerless. Has twitter finally met its&#8217; match?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20612225_20618529,00.html" target="_blank">People</a> magazine might have had the ultimate point when it came to the clash between social media and its&#8217; denizens and the corporate behemoth that is NBC, <strong>&#8220;it&#8217;s exciting to see Twitter flexing its muscle – and having a lot of  rambunctious fun doing it – but the fact remains that NBC&#8217;s ratings were  through the roof. A reminder that, although the dinosaurs died out,  while they lived they ate whatever, whenever and wherever they liked.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>And <em>that,</em> my friends, may just be the final word<strong>. </strong>For now. My money is on Rio 2016 being a very different story.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3544</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro for August 13, 2012</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3541</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3541#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings & Rumblings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the Olympics are over. I&#8217;m already suffering from withdrawal and it&#8217;s only been a matter of hours. Thanks to NBC&#8217;s boneheaded move to delay the end of the Closing Ceremony and the performance by the Who until after the premiere of &#8220;Animal Practice&#8221; I won&#8217;t be missing NBC&#8217;s coverage all that much. Did anyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So, the Olympics are over. I&#8217;m already suffering from withdrawal and it&#8217;s only been a matter of hours. Thanks to NBC&#8217;s boneheaded move to delay the end of the Closing Ceremony and the performance by the Who until after the premiere of &#8220;Animal Practice&#8221; I won&#8217;t be missing NBC&#8217;s coverage all that much. Did anyone else find that to be incredibly manipulative? I understand the ratings game and the need to get the right viewers at the right time, but throughout the two-week period it seemed to me like NBC&#8217;s tape-delayed coverage was so heavily weighted towards keeping the viewer in the dark about what would be on when and therefore forcing you to watch from 8 until midnight&#8211;a feat not possible for most working adults. In short, I felt like I was being toyed with. And, the stunt with the Who last night was the most flagrant of the many violations over the course of the Games. It just seemed cheap and if there is something I associate with the Olympics it is a certain level of class&#8211;a sublimation of the purely commercial concerns of every day TV to the ideals of the Games. Perhaps, I am still a bit naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3541</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Royal Watch: Olympic edition</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3536</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3536#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[London 2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate was seen today at the woman&#8217;s boxing final at the ExCel center. Team GB member Nicola Adams was crowned as the first women&#8217;s boxing Olympic champ!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Kate was seen today at the woman&#8217;s boxing final at the ExCel center. Team GB member Nicola Adams was crowned as the first women&#8217;s boxing Olympic champ!</p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2186098-1476827A000005DC-911_634x711.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3537" title="article-2186098-1476827A000005DC-911_634x711" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2186098-1476827A000005DC-911_634x711.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="711" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2186098-14763F76000005DC-196_634x421.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3538" title="article-2186098-14763F76000005DC-196_634x421" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2186098-14763F76000005DC-196_634x421.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="421" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3536</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reese Witherspoon&#8217;s pregnancy chic</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3531</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3531#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reese Witherspoon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She may be approaching her due date any day now, but Reese is still looking as chic as ever &#8212; even if she might feel like she&#8217;s the size of a house, you wouldn&#8217;t know it from her adorable and super-stylish parade of outfits. Here is just a sampling from the past week or so&#8230;how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>She may be approaching her due date any day now, but Reese is still looking as chic as ever &#8212; even if she might feel like she&#8217;s the size of a house, you wouldn&#8217;t know it from her adorable and super-stylish parade of outfits. Here is just a sampling from the past week or so&#8230;how cute is she?!?!</p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-0-14685634000005DC-653_634x547.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3532" title="article-0-14685634000005DC-653_634x547" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-0-14685634000005DC-653_634x547.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="547" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2185907-1474BBB8000005DC-50_634x917.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3533" title="article-2185907-1474BBB8000005DC-50_634x917" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2185907-1474BBB8000005DC-50_634x917.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="917" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2185489-14719193000005DC-67_634x833.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3534" title="article-2185489-14719193000005DC-67_634x833" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2185489-14719193000005DC-67_634x833.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="833" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3531</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blake Lively and Gucci Premiere</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3509</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3509#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Lively]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drive director Nicolas Winding Refn directed Blake in her first ad for Gucci Premiere fragrance. Given the director&#8217;s pedigree the ad is somewhat underwhelming&#8211;showing Blake in all her glorious blondness standing in front of the lights of LA and walking in the desert&#8211;it&#8217;s not that exciting. Sure, she looks gorgeous&#8211;that&#8217;s her brand, all blond and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span><em>Drive </em> director Nicolas Winding Refn directed Blake in her first ad for Gucci Premiere fragrance. Given the director&#8217;s pedigree the ad is somewhat underwhelming&#8211;showing Blake in all her glorious blondness standing in front of the lights of LA and walking in the desert&#8211;it&#8217;s not that exciting. Sure, she looks gorgeous&#8211;that&#8217;s her brand, all blond and breasty&#8211;but there&#8217;s just not that much to get excited about here. See the ad below&#8230;</span></p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NzV3GRtwftQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3509</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Hugs!</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3513</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3513#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[London 2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince WIlliam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How adorable are Prince William and his Duchess Catherine here? They came out to support Team GB again today and were all flirty and affectionate&#8211;a rare display of PDA. Daily Royal Watch continues as the Games go on&#8230; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>How adorable are Prince William and his Duchess Catherine here? They came out to support Team GB again today and were all flirty and affectionate&#8211;a rare display of PDA.</p>
<p>Daily Royal Watch continues as the Games go on&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2182779-14599CD8000005DC-728_964x5922.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3521" title="Olympics Day 6 - Cycling - Track" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/article-2182779-14599CD8000005DC-728_964x5922.jpg" alt="" width="531" height="574" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3513</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Newsroom&#8221; and Aaron Sorkin&#8217;s woman problem</title>
		<link>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3490</link>
		<comments>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3490#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allison Pill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Mortimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivia Munn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Newsroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkerhouseblog.com/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If, like me, you&#8217;ve been suffering through the early episodes of The Newsroom and occasionally finding yourself entertained but more often bemused, know that you are not alone. There are a lot of us out there. Enough, in fact, that New York magazine&#8217;s Vulture reports that HBO brought Sorkin in to this summer&#8217;s Television Critics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/newsroomcast2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3492" title="newsroomcast2" src="http://walkerhouseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/newsroomcast2.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="435" /></a></p>
<p>If, like me, you&#8217;ve been suffering through the early episodes of <em>The Newsroom</em> and occasionally finding yourself entertained but more often bemused,  know that you are not alone. There are a lot of us out there. Enough, in  fact, that <em>New York </em>magazine&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2012/08/aaron-sorkin-defends-the-newsroom.html" target="_blank">Vulture</a> reports that HBO brought Sorkin in to this summer&#8217;s Television Critics  Association press tour to try and address the flak the show has been  getting from critics and recappers alike. Sorkin&#8217;s portrayal of the  women on the show, in particular, has come under fire. A highlight  from the Vulture piece and analysis below.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Asked about the <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2012/07/newsroom-aaron-sorkin-women-hostile-misogyny.html">charges of sexism</a> against the show, Sorkin says he respects that opinion, “but I 100   percent disagree with it.” The women are “every bit the equals of the   men, I think they are not just talked about as being good at their job,   they are plainly good at their job.” He then rattles off examples of   this: <em>News Night</em> is better only after MacKenzie arrives   declaring, “we are going to do better,” Maggie is a beacon of loyalty   and Sloan is so serious-minded about economics she’s turned down   higher-paying jobs on Wall Street.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll concede that in  large part the women are shown to be competent. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the  issue. What&#8217;s more concerning is that the show seems to treat women in  general and the women characters on the show with a hostility that is  reserved for them and not the men. For starters there&#8217;s the sexual  subtext of both MacKenzie and Will&#8217;s relationship and Maggie&#8217;s  relationships with her boyfriend Don and  boy-who-wants-to-be-her-boyfriend, Jim. Both MacKenzie&#8217;s and Maggie&#8217;s  behavior is colored by these relationships much more so than that of  their male counterparts. Maggie is portrayed as extremely good at her  job, but her personal life dominates her storylines and she is shown in a  way that makes her seem like a little girl, like someone who needs  protection or coddling (see almost every scene between her and Don, the  scene where she is talked out of a panic attack by Jim). Whereas the men  are adult, competent, independent, and even a tad misanthropic in the  case of Will. They stand on their own and are not defined in opposition  to a woman.</p>
<p>MacKenzie and Will&#8217;s personal history plays into her  storyline much more significantly than it does his&#8211;in respect to how it  affects the way that they treat each other. MacKenzie is forever  apologetic and deferential to Will&#8211;and not just in a  you&#8217;re-the-talent-and-I-must-treat-you-with-kid-gloves sort of way. Yes, she&#8217;s the one who screwed up their relationship so some amount of regret should be allowed, but it infuses every interaction they have. She&#8217;ll always be the &#8220;silly little girl&#8221; who didn&#8217;t know a good thing when she had it and because of this she&#8217;s always ready and willing to be put down, to be put in her place. Will, on the other hand, despite how unpleasant and rude he can be, is depicted as someone to be reckoned with, someone to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>The women who pass in and out of <em>The Newsroom</em> world arguably have it the worst. Will&#8217;s parade of dates are more concerned with the Real Housewives of New Jersey than the &#8220;serious&#8221; topics he&#8217;d prefer to talk about. Maggie&#8217;s roommate worries that Jim will think she&#8217;s stupid because she <em>only</em> went to Parsons and works in fashion&#8211;frivolous worlds compared to his serious and important one. So, are the women of<em> The Newsroom</em> just comic relief for the serious-minded men on the show? Sorkin has a few more weeks this season to argue otherwise&#8230;after all, they can only go up from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://walkerhouseblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3490</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
